So far, I have focused mostly on values as
the basis for action – how I decide what to do.
But values are more than that.
They are also the lens through which I see the world, coloring my view. If
justice is an important value to me, when I read news reports, the treatment
mistreatment of a juvenile offender by the police will probably be more
relevant to me than news of the construction of a new highway. We could call this detecting meaning because I detect what is important to me (the
justice issue) in the news broadcast.
Researchers Laura King
and Joshua Hicks (2009) did a series of studies in which they investigated meaning
detection and another process that they called constructing meaning.
Constructing meaning happens when I try to see the world in my normal way
and it doesn’t work so I construct a
new way of seeing it. In other words, if
my regular lenses don’t make things clear, I get new glasses. King and Hicks looked at meaning detection and
construction in major positive and negative events. In one study, they found that people only
constructed meaning (new glasses) when major events were negative; if they were
positive they detected meaning (regular glasses). In another study, some participants were asked
to write about their most important positive experience and others about their
most important negative experience. Then
they were asked it the experience “fit” with their view of the world or if they
“struggled” to make sense of it. All
participants were also asked if the event was very meaningful to them. The
researchers found that detected meaning was particularly
associated with the meaningfulness of positive events and constructed meaning
was associated the meaningfulness of negative events. So if a good thing
happens to me, I can use my regular glasses to see it. And if it is a big thing, that will feel
meaningful. If I value fairness and I
get a big promotion, it will tend to fit with my sense that the world is fair
and I will find it important. But if I
get fired and my value is fairness, I may struggle to make sense of it, finding
it unfair. Perhaps I will only be able to find the
meaning it when I get new glasses.
As we work to articulate and live according
to our values, negative experiences are an opportunity to try on a new way of
seeing things. In a recent study
conducted in our own research group (Fitzpatrick et al., 2016), we offered a
workshop on values clarification and congruence to a group of university
employees and interviewed them about their experiences after it was over. All of the participants indicated that they
signed up for the workshop in the context of a challenging issue they were struggling with in
their lives. We had not thought of it
that way, but I guess we were helping fit them with new glasses.
References
Fitzpatrick, M., Henson, A., Grumet, R., Poolokasingham, G., Foa, C.,
Comeau, T., & Predergast, C. (2016).
Challenge, focus, inspiration and support: Processes of
values clarification and congruence. Journal
of Contextual and Behavioral Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.02.001
King, L. A., & Hicks, J. A. (2009). Detecting and constructing
meaning in life events. The Journal of
Positive Psychology, 4(5), 317-330. doi:10.1080/17439760902992316
No comments:
Post a Comment