It is difficult to live
in the world of 2016 and not be afraid of people whose commit acts of terror. There are currently millions of people
fleeing places where ideological wars have made it impossible for them to live
in safety. When I try to imagine what
drives the people who commit violent acts of terror, I have to admit that it is
very difficult for me. One explanation is
that they come from places that have different values than mine. Could that be right?
Psychological
researchers Fischer and Schwartz (2011) have studied values around the world.
In a single study they combined data from more 42,000 people (26,000 students
in 66 countries and 16,000 teachers in 54 countries). The people came from all inhabited continents
and included highly diverse geographic, linguistic, cultural, and religious
groups. All of these people completed
the same measure - the Schwartz Values Survey, the measure with ten
values organized in a circle (see
February 9th post). Analyzing the
data, the researchers found only small country
differences in average value priorities. To ensure that this finding was not because of
the measure they used, they also looked at data from the World Values Survey www.worldvaluessurvey.org that used
a different measure. That sample included
84,887 people from 62 countries and regions across six continents. Again, the data indicated that agreements on values within countries were low
for most items. Together these studies
suggest that national cultures do not determine our values priorities. If I want to know who to fear, I cannot judge
based on where they come from.
Reference
Fischer, R., & Schwartz, S. (2011). Whence differences in value
priorities? Individual, cultural, or artifactual sources. Journal
of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(7), 1127-1144. doi:10.1177/0022022110381429
So political speech writers have it all wrong? There aren't Canadian values or Amerisan values? They sure live to talk about them!
ReplyDelete