We don’t just have one value. Most of us have a number of ways of
acting that we believe in. And often we find
ourselves in situations in which we need to decide between two courses of
action that seem to take us in different directions. Shalom Schwartz (1994), an Israeli values researcher
has a way of understanding and organizing the different values that sheds light
on this issue. Using different kinds of statistical
analysis and participants from around the world, Schwartz has found that
ten basic human values show a pattern of relationships that can be graphed around
a circle in what he calls a “motivational continuum”. Values that are next to each other are
closely related; values that are across from each other are quite
different. They are further organized
along two opposing dimensions. On the
self-transcendence vs. self enhancement dimension, values that emphasize the
interests of others oppose values that emphasize self-interest. On the openness to change vs. conservation
dimension, values that emphasize independent action oppose values that emphasize
security and conformity.
The idea is that we tend to have values that are
close to one another on the circle. So if you look at the graphic, you can see
that actions that are stimulating and novel may contradict actions that that are
compatible with traditional ways of doing things: people who like sky diving
are not usually the same people who like tea parties. However actions that are
compatible with traditions are probably appeal to those who like security:
people who like tea parties may also be those who have good retirement
savings plans. Quite a large body of research
supports this structure and it looks pretty much the same in countries around
the world. To go back then to the question of
having conflicting values, this research seems to say no that won’t tend to
happen. You will not tend to have strong values conflicts. What does tend to happen is that
we need to make choices in how we realize our values and a single value can
take us in many different directions. I’ll
say more about this tomorrow when we talk about setting goals in support of
values.
References
Schwartz,
S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of
human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x
No comments:
Post a Comment